Astonishing COVID-19 Testing Fraud Revealed
The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the checklist of misleading methods is the usage of a check that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This permits mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) check. The actual fact is, the PCR check shouldn’t be designed to be used as a diagnostic device because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “dwell” or reproductive ones.1
It is a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses should not interchangeable by way of infectivity. You probably have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can not unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome folks testing “optimistic.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Take a look at Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR check works and the way we’re deciphering outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Attributable to its tiny dimension, it have to be amplified to grow to be discernible. Every spherical of amplification known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given check or lab known as a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the better the chance that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the check reads optimistic even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no menace to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Medical Infectious Ailments revealed that if you run a PCR check at a CT of 35 or larger, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false optimistic price.
But, a check generally known as the Corman-Drosten paper and exams really helpful by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention advocate working PCR exams at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the check ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of optimistic exams, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many are actually questioning whether or not this was performed on function to crash the worldwide financial system and present cowl for the implementation of what is generally known as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s belongings.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as general mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and in step with earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, persons are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness shouldn’t be killing an extra variety of folks. The identical variety of folks would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC knowledge15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only trigger on the loss of life certificates.
“For deaths with circumstances or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further circumstances or causes per loss of life,” the CDC said, and any a kind of comorbidities may have killed these folks even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT must be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is no scarcity of knowledge at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in mild of all these knowledge tells us they are not curious about getting an correct image of the an infection price.
For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Ailments confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR check have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy price is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a optimistic PCR check being a true optimistic shrinks to zero.
Extra lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic assessment17 revealed within the journal of Medical Infectious Ailments assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which had been revealed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing dwell virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the possibility of a optimistic check truly being because of the presence of dwell (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the chances of dwell virus tradition diminished by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to establish any dwell viruses in circumstances the place a optimistic PCR check had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, with a purpose to produce dwell virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR check used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, when you have signs of COVID-19 and check optimistic utilizing a PCR check that was run at 35 amplification cycles or larger, then you’re prone to be contaminated and infectious.
Nonetheless, in the event you should not have signs, but check optimistic utilizing a PCR check run at 35 CTs or larger, then it’s possible a false optimistic and also you pose no threat to others as you are unlikely to hold any dwell virus. The truth is, offered you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even in the event you check optimistic with a check run at 24 CTs or larger.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Take a look at
The video above consists of a number of interviews with specialists who’ve overtly criticized the usage of PCR testing to diagnose infections akin to COVID-19. These embrace:
The inventor of the PCR check, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the check for different infections, akin to HIV, however died in August 2019, a number of months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Heart for Proof-Based mostly Medication
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a marketing consultant pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular medication and a world-renowned knowledgeable on the PCR check
In 1993, Mullis spoke about the usage of the PCR check to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the check does is amplify molecules into one thing you possibly can detect, nevertheless it can not inform you whether or not these particles truly pose a threat to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you possibly can basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all kinds, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply lifeless particles that pose no threat.
Bustin factors out that if you get a optimistic outcome utilizing a CT of 35 or larger, you are trying on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The chance of that inflicting a well being downside is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR check with a CT above 35 renders it kind of ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting lifeless nucelotides. No dwell virus may be detected at CTs that prime.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based mostly
November 30, 2020, a workforce of twenty-two worldwide scientists revealed a assessment18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was rapidly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual internationally.
In response to Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Additional-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key wrongdoer within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted on account of “deadly errors,”24 one in every of which is the truth that it was written (and the check itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was accessible. All they used was the genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was revealed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer assessment. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who are actually demanding the paper’s retraction, said:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that check has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID check.
When Drosten developed the check, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the check from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They’d a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like supplying you with a number of bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It may very well be any fish … Hear, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you suppose is EEE, so you set it in … That is mainly a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten check paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There may be nothing on the middle of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there aren’t any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they mentioned: ‘This is the viral isolate.’ Are you aware what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. They usually assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all filled with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the assessment reads, partly:26
“A call to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to vastly decrease human value and struggling going ahead. Is it not in one of the best curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is evident. Within the face of all of the great PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There may be not a lot of a alternative left within the framework of scientific integrity and accountability.”
The critique towards PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive circumstances at all. The examine evaluated knowledge from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Could 14 and June 1, 2020.
A whole of 300 examined optimistic however had no signs. Of the 34,424 folks with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined optimistic a second time. But, after they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined optimistic (both for the first or second time), no dwell virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Checks Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody exams are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. You probably have antibodies towards SARS-CoV-2, that will be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus in some unspecified time in the future prior to now. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 antibody check may additionally end up optimistic when you have antibodies towards frequent chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses chargeable for the frequent chilly can lead to a optimistic COVID-19 antibody check, even in the event you’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the frequent chilly additionally seem to offer some basic and long-lasting resistance towards SARS-CoV-2.
One such examine,32,33 revealed Could 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from gentle circumstances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell stage, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
In response to the authors, this implies there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘frequent chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, in the event you’ve recovered from a standard chilly brought on by a specific coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate if you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you immune to COVID-19.
One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in probably the most extreme circumstances — about 1 in 5. So, a adverse antibody check would not essentially rule out the likelihood that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. The truth is, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might truly be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 revealed within the July 1, 2020, concern of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based medication for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed a number of the accessible knowledge, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, you will need to keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t suppose they’re immune when they don’t seem to be.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex check and for a hypothetical check that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which possible mirror present circumstances in the US and elsewhere, we’d argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex check.”
Ebell and Barry identified that lots of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. In addition they really helpful that labs report check outcomes “in a means that displays the native inhabitants prevalence based mostly on widespread testing and embrace the false-positive price,” as this data “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making relating to earlier an infection and return to work or college.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that knowledge of their reporting, and the means issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that check optimistic for COVID-19 an infection don’t have any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out figuring out it, and which 90% are capable of get rid of with out remedy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to sluggish the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital assets wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting folks to die on account of lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even lowering the variety of folks that will finally get contaminated. They definitely had been by no means meant to stop all loss of life. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not potential, beneath any circumstance.
Quick-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely supposed to decelerate the unfold so that, finally, naturally-acquired herd immunity — one of the best variety — would stop it from reemerging. But the purpose posts maintain shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns became months in some areas. Finally, we had been instructed the whole lot would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine grew to become accessible. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been instructed we would nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns properly into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?
The one rational cause for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering based mostly on a mixture of wildly manipulated knowledge and flawed exams.
Apart from PCR testing knowledge, there is no proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there’s such a factor as COVID-19, and other people have and do die from it, there aren’t any extra deaths on account of it.36,37,38 The overall mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, except we suppose we must always shut down the world and cease dwelling as a result of folks die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there is no cause to close down the world as a result of some folks occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court docket dominated39,40 that the PCR check is “not a dependable check for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single optimistic PCR check can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Subsequently, “any enforced quarantine based mostly on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The court docket additionally famous that forcing wholesome folks to self-isolate may very well be a violation of their elementary proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized circumstances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, take into account:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to unbiased specialists — do the analysis. Learn by the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the details on PCR testing, so you possibly can clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- If you’re a medical skilled, particularly in the event you’re a member of knowledgeable society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from unbiased specialists.
- Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be part of a gaggle so that you just can have assist — Examples of teams fashioned to combat towards authorities overreach embrace Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening colleges and defending kids’s rights within the U.Ok., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. workforce of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise house owners and fogeys who’re combating to guard freedom and liberty.