Home Health Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste-Autopresse.eu

Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste-Autopresse.eu

Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste-Autopresse.eu

Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste

2020-11-13 06:00:00

From the starting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the clarion name has been to check, take a look at and take a look at some extra. Nevertheless, proper from the beginning, severe questions arose about the checks getting used to diagnose this an infection, and questions have solely multiplied since then.

Constructive reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) checks have been used because the justification for protecting giant parts of the world locked down for the higher a part of 2020.

This, regardless of the truth that PCR checks have confirmed remarkably unreliable with excessive false consequence charges, and are not designed for use as a diagnostic instrument within the first place as they can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “stay” or reproductive ones.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vp and scientific director of Pfizer, has even gone on file stating1 that false optimistic outcomes from unreliable PCR checks are getting used to “manufacture a ‘second wave’ based mostly on ‘new instances,'” when in truth a second wave is very unlikely.

Understanding PCR Assessments

Earlier than his dying, the inventor of the PCR take a look at, Kary Mullis, repeatedly but unsuccessfully pressured that this take a look at shouldn’t be used as a diagnostic instrument for the easy motive that it is incapable of diagnosing illness. A optimistic take a look at doesn’t truly imply that an energetic an infection is current. As famous in a U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and prevention publication on coronavirus and PCR testing dated July 13 2020:2

  • Detection of viral RNA might not point out the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for scientific signs.
  • The efficiency of this take a look at has not been established for monitoring remedy of 2019-nCoV an infection.
  • This take a look at can not rule out ailments attributable to different bacterial or viral pathogens.

So, what does the PCR test actually tell us? The PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Nevertheless, the genetic snippets are so small they should be amplified with a purpose to develop into discernible. Every spherical of amplification is named a cycle.

Amplification over 35 cycles is taken into account unreliable and scientifically unjustified, but Drosten checks and checks really useful by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles.

What this does is amplify any, even insignificant sequences of viral DNA that is perhaps current to the purpose that the take a look at reads “optimistic,” even when the viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive. Because of these extreme cycle thresholds, you find yourself with a far larger variety of optimistic checks than you would in any other case.

We have additionally had issues with defective and contaminated checks. As quickly because the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 grew to become out there in January 2020, German researchers shortly developed a PCR take a look at for the virus.

In March 2020, The New York Instances3 reported the preliminary take a look at kits developed by the CDC had been discovered to be flawed. The Verge additionally reported4 that this flawed CDC take a look at in flip grew to become the premise for the WHO’s take a look at, which the CDC ended up refusing to make use of.

PCR Assessments Can’t Detect An infection

Maybe most importantly of all, the PCR checks can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “stay” or reproductive ones. What which means is that PCR checks can not detect an infection. Interval. It can not let you know whether or not you are at present sick, whether or not you may develop signs within the close to future, or whether or not you are contagious.

The checks might choose up useless particles or inactive viral particles that pose no threat in any way to the affected person and others. What’s extra, the take a look at can choose up the presence of different coronaviruses, so a optimistic consequence might merely point out that you’ve got recuperated from a standard chilly up to now.

An “an infection” is when a virus penetrates right into a cell and replicates. Because the virus multiplies, signs set in. An individual is just infectious if the virus is definitely replicating. So long as the virus is inactive and never replicating, it is utterly innocent each to the host and others.

Likelihood is, you probably have no signs, a optimistic take a look at merely means it has detected inactive viral DNA in your physique. This could additionally imply that you’re not contagious and pose no threat to anybody.

For all of these causes, quite a lot of extremely revered scientists all over the world are actually saying that what we’ve isn’t a COVID-19 pandemic however a PCR take a look at pandemic. In his September 20, 2020, article5 “Lies, Damned Lies and Well being Statistics — The Lethal Hazard of False Positives,” Yeadon explains why basing our pandemic response on optimistic PCR checks is so problematic.

Briefly, it seems thousands and thousands of persons are merely being discovered to hold inactive viral DNA that pose no threat to anybody, but these take a look at outcomes are being utilized by the global technocracy to implement a model new economic and social system based on draconian surveillance and totalitarian controls.

Artificially Created Justifications for Totalitarian Controls

As reported by The Vaccine Response, September 29, 2020:6

“The take a look at’s threshold is so excessive that it detects individuals with the stay virus in addition to these with just a few genetic fragments left over from a previous an infection that now not poses a threat. It is like discovering a hair in a room after an individual left it, says Michael Mina, MD, an epidemiologist on the Harvard T.H. Chan College of Public Well being.7

In three units of testing information that embody cycle thresholds compiled by officers in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, as much as 90% of individuals testing optimistic carried barely any virus, a evaluation by The New York Instances discovered8

‘We have been utilizing one sort of knowledge for every little thing, and that’s simply plus or minus — that is all,’ Dr. Mina mentioned. ‘We’re utilizing that for scientific diagnostics, for public well being, for coverage decision-making.’

However ‘sure’ or ‘no’ is not adequate, he added. It is the quantity of virus that ought to dictate the contaminated affected person’s subsequent steps. ‘It is actually irresponsible, I believe, to forgo the popularity that this can be a quantitative challenge,’ Dr. Mina mentioned.”

Once more, medical consultants agree any cycle threshold over 35 cycles makes the take a look at too delicate, as at that time it begins choosing up innocent inactive DNA fragments. Mina believes a extra affordable cutoff could be 30 or much less.

In accordance with The New York Instances,9 the CDC’s personal calculations present it is extraordinarily unlikely to detect stay viruses in samples which have gone via greater than 33 cycles, and analysis10 printed in April 2020 concluded sufferers with optimistic PCR checks that had a cycle threshold above 33 weren’t contagious and will safely be discharged from the hospital or house isolation.

Importantly, when officers on the New York state laboratory, the Wadsworth Heart, reanalyzed testing information at The Instances’ request, they discovered that altering the edge from 40 cycles to 35 cycles eradicated about 43% of the optimistic outcomes. Limiting it to 30 cycles eradicated a whopping 63%.11 The Vaccine Response provides:12

“In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90% of people that examined optimistic in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed detrimental if the threshold have been 30 cycles, Dr. Mina mentioned. ‘I’d say that none of these individuals ought to be contact-traced, not one,’ he mentioned.

‘I am actually shocked that it might be that prime — the proportion of individuals with excessive CT worth outcomes,’ mentioned Ashish Jha, MD, director of the Harvard International Well being Institute. ‘Boy, does it actually change the best way we have to be fascinated by testing’13

In late August, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) authorised the primary fast coronavirus take a look at that does not want any particular laptop gear. Made by Abbot Laboratories, the 15-minute take a look at [BinaxNOW] will promote for U.S. $5 however nonetheless requires a nasal swab to be taken by a well being employee.14

The Abbot take a look at is the fourth fast point-of-care take a look at that appears for the presence of antigens slightly than the virus’s genetic code because the PCR molecular checks do.15

Large Waste of Assets

As famous by Dr. Tom Jefferson and professor Carl Henegan in an October 31, 2020, article within the Day by day Mail,16 mass PCR testing has been a large waste or assets, because it would not present us with the data we truly have to know — who’s infectious, how far is the virus spreading and how briskly does it unfold?

As an alternative, it has led to financial devastation from enterprise shutdowns and isolating noninfectious individuals of their houses for weeks and months on finish. Jefferson and Henegan declare they shared their pandemic response plan with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson over a month in the past, and simply offered it to him once more. “We urge him to listen and embrace it,” they write, including:

“There are solely two issues about which we could be sure: first, that lockdowns don’t work within the lengthy time period … The concept that a month of financial hardship will allow some form of ‘reset’, permitting us a brighter future, is a fantasy. What, when it ends, will we assume will occur? In the meantime, ever-increasing restrictions will destroy lives and livelihoods.

The second certainty is this: that we have to discover a manner out of the mess that does no extra harm than the virus itself … Our technique could be to deal with the 4 key failings.”

These 4 areas are:

  1. Addressing the issues within the authorities’s mass testing program
  2. Addressing “the blight of confused and contradictory statistics”
  3. Shield and isolate the weak — primarily the aged, but in addition hospitalized sufferers generally and workers — whereas permitting the remaining to take care of “some semblance of regular life”
  4. Inform the general public concerning the true and quantifiable prices of lockdown that “kill individuals simply as absolutely as COVID-19”

“If we do this stuff, there’s actual hope that we are able to study to stay with the virus. That, in spite of everything, was speculated to be the plan,” Jefferson and Henegan notice. With regard to testing, the pair name “for a nationwide program of testing high quality management to make sure that outcomes are correct, exact and constant.”

Importantly, we should not depend on optimistic/detrimental readings alone. The outcomes should be assessed in relation to different elements, such because the age of the topic and whether or not they’re symptomatic, to find out who truly poses an infectious threat. You’ll be able to evaluation the complete particulars of their proposed plan on the finish of their Day by day Mail article.17

Lockdown Risks Have Been Saved Out of Public Dialogue

Jefferson and Henegan aren’t the one ones highlighting the undeniable fact that the worldwide lockdown technique is inflicting extra hurt and destruction than the virus itself. In a June 16, 2020 article in The Federalist, James Lucas, a New York Metropolis lawyer, wrote:18

“If we’ll permit fashions and modelers to dictate the complete nature of our society, one would hope that the fashions are as full as doable. But the epidemiological fashions which have so reworked our world are critically incomplete, and due to this fact basically insufficient.

Any medical remedy is speculated to be examined for each efficacy and security. There have been a number of research19 inspecting the effectiveness of the lockdowns in combating the unfold of the COVID-19 virus, with blended conclusions.

To this point, nonetheless, none of those research or fashions have analyzed the security facet of the lockdown remedy. In response to questions from doctor Sens. Rand Paul and Invoice Cassidy, Dr. Anthony Fauci admits20 this facet of the equation has not been accounted for within the fashions now driving our world.

As famous in an open letter21 just lately signed by greater than 600 health-care professionals, the general public well being prices from the lockdowns — described as a ‘mass casualty incident’ are actual and rising.

These fashions are estimations based mostly on present analysis. The continuously altering projections of coronavirus deaths are extrapolations from analysis on earlier epidemics. But modelers don’t have any excuse for leaving evaluations of the lockdowns’ huge prices to public well being out of their fashions.”

The Hidden Prices of Lockdowns

How does the “lockdown remedy” have an effect on public security? In his article, Lucas highlights the following:22

Elevated persistent illness charges resulting from unemployment, poverty and placing non-COVID medical care on maintain — Analysis23 by the Veterans Administration has proven delaying most cancers remedy for only one month led to a 20% improve in mortality. One other research24 discovered every one-month delay in breast most cancers analysis elevated mortality by 10%

Elevated charges of psychological well being issues resulting from unemployment and isolation

Elevated mortality charges from suicide — In a single research,25 being unemployed was related to a twofold to threefold larger relative threat of suicide. A more moderen research26 estimates “deaths of despair” linked to lockdowns could also be round 75,000 within the U.S.

Lowered collective life span — Prolonged unemployment can also be related with shorter, unhealthier lives. Hannes Schwandt, a well being economics researcher at Northwestern College, estimates an prolonged financial shutdown may shorten the lifespan of 6.4 million Individuals coming into the job market by a median of about two years.27 Lucas notes:

“If epidemiologists do not care to take account of this toll, one other occupation should. A research28 simply launched by a gaggle of South African actuaries estimates that the web discount in lifespan from elevated unemployment and poverty resulting from a nationwide lockdown will exceed the elevated lifespan resulting from lives saved from COVID-19 by the lockdown by an element of 30 to 1.

In different phrases, every year of further life attributable to isolating potential coronavirus victims within the lockdown comes at a value of 30 years misplaced because of the detrimental public well being results of a lockdown …”

Lack of schooling can also be related to considerably shorter life spans and poorer well being. Highschool drop-outs die on common 9 years prior to faculty graduates,29 and faculty closings disproportionally have an effect on poorer college students.

Who Pays the Most?

As famous by Lucas, along with calculating the general prices on society, modelers should additionally decide “on whom these prices fall,” as a result of the prices should not borne equally by all. The implications of the lockdowns disproportionally have an effect on those that are already essentially the most weak — financially and well being clever — akin to these residing close to the poverty line, the chronically sick, individuals with psychological sickness and minorities in normal.

“Opposite to the PR slogan, we’re NOT all on this collectively,” Lucas writes.30 “We want much less insipid pro-lockdown propaganda extolling the virtues of the ‘important’ staff, and extra severe evaluation of the big public well being toll the lockdowns are imposing on them. In any other case, we might come to see the period of coronavirus as merely the time the place pro-lockdown elites sacrificed the working class31 to guard themselves.”

A Pandemic of Fearmongering

An October 28, 2020, article featured by the Ron Paul Institute factors out that:32

“Ever because the alleged pandemic erupted this previous March the mainstream media has spewed a continuous stream of misinformation that seems to be laser targeted on producing most concern among the many citizenry.

However the details and the science merely do not help the grave image painted of a lethal virus sweeping the land. Sure, we do have a pandemic, nevertheless it’ a pandemic of ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased truth.”

9 details that may be backed up with information “paints a really completely different image from the concern and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting residents,” the article states. Along with the truth that PCR testing is virtually ineffective, for all the explanations already talked about, these data-backed details embody:

1. A optimistic take a look at is NOT a “case” — As defined by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Docs for Catastrophe Preparedness33 lecture, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” media and public well being officers seem to have purposefully conflated “instances” or optimistic checks with the precise sickness.

Medically talking, a “case” refers to a sick particular person. It by no means ever referred to somebody who had no signs of sickness. Now rapidly, this well-established medical time period, “case,” has been utterly and arbitrarily redefined to imply somebody who examined optimistic for the presence of viral RNA. As famous by Merritt, “That isn’t epidemiology. That is fraud.”

2. In accordance to the CDC34 and different analysis information,35 the COVID-19 survival fee is over 99%, and the overwhelming majority of deaths happen in these over 70, which is near regular life expectancy.

3. CDC evaluation reveals 85% of sufferers testing optimistic for COVID-19 wore face masks “usually” or “at all times” within the two weeks previous their optimistic take a look at. As famous within the Ron Paul article,36 “The one rational conclusion from this research is that material face masks provide little if any safety from Covid-19 an infection.”

4. There are cheap, confirmed profitable therapies for COVID-19 — Examples embody varied regimens involving hydroxychloroquine with zinc and antibiotics, quercetin-based protocols, the MATH+ protocol and nebulized hydrogen peroxide.

5. The dying fee has not risen regardless of pandemic deaths — Knowledge37,38 present the general all-cause mortality has remained regular throughout 2020 and would not veer from the norm. In different phrases, COVID-19 has not killed off extra of the inhabitants than would have died in any given 12 months anyway.

As famous within the Ron Paul article,39 “In accordance with the CDC as of early Could 2020 the entire variety of deaths within the US was 944,251 from January 1 — April thirtieth. That is truly barely decrease than the variety of deaths throughout the identical interval in 2017 when 946,067 whole deaths have been reported.”

15,000 Docs and Scientists Name for Finish to Lockdowns

All in all, there are a lot of causes to suspect that continued lockdowns, social distancing and mask mandates are utterly pointless and won’t considerably alter the course of this pandemic sickness, or the ultimate dying depend.

And, with regard to common PCR testing the place people are examined each two weeks or much more steadily, whether or not they have signs or not, that is clearly a pointless effort that yields ineffective information. It is only a tool to spread fear, which in flip permits for the fast implementation of the totalitarian management mechanisms required to pull off The Great Reset. Fortuitously, increasingly individuals are actually beginning to see via this plot.

About 45,000 scientists and docs worldwide have already signed the Nice Barrington Declaration,40 which requires the top to all lockdowns and implementation of a herd immunity method to the pandemic, that means governments ought to permit people who find themselves not at vital threat of great COVID-19 sickness to return to regular life, as the lockdown method is having a devastating impact on public well being — far worse than the virus itself.41,42 The declaration states:43

“Coming from each the left and proper, and all over the world, we’ve devoted our careers to defending individuals. Present lockdown insurance policies are producing devastating results on quick and long-term public well being …

The most compassionate method that balances the dangers and advantages of reaching herd immunity, is to permit those that are at minimal threat of dying to stay their lives usually to construct up immunity to coronavirus via pure an infection, whereas higher defending those that are at highest threat. We name this targeted safety.”

The declaration factors out that present lockdown insurance policies will end in extra mortality sooner or later, primarily amongst youthful individuals and the working class. As of November 5, 2020, The Nice Barrington Declaration44 had been signed by 11,791 medical and public well being scientists, 33,903 medical practitioners and 617,685 “involved residents.”45

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.